Thank You. I love animals. People are also creatures like animals.

What a gross misrepresentation of something that is actually important and serious... I'm assuming that you weren't intending to do this, but animal 'marriage' just reeks of the stupid arguments people use against gay marriage and the like ("Today it's two men, what's next - animals?!") And the groups, I'd have put it as liberal/environmentalist vs farmers/capitalist(?) - because using animals as a means to an end to produce meat is profoundly capitalist (treats animals as just another product w supply/demand) and against their rights and interests.

what

i dont feel like trying this out, but an obvious suggested policy for this is Factory farming regulations. (not the same as food regulations)

possible effects:
+ liberals
+envirementalists
- capitalists
-conservatives (after high levels of factory farming regulation)
- (minor) GDP
- farmers
+ membership, farmers, liberals.

Ah, another way to detrect from the real issues. lol

hahahaha, marrige with an animal, hhahahahah, what a freaking genius idea

This is a joke post?

I can't tell if this is serious or a parody of "environmentalists" like PETA. This makes no sense.

Great concept, very odd execution. I can't actually think of an ideological end of the spectrum that supports zoophilia in totality or majority. I'd suggest going with the more traditional view from having them viewed as objects to having pets be granted some rights to having standards for animals meant to be used as food all the way to having limited degrees of rights for things like dolphins and elephants.

I think animal rights should decrease GDP and farmer membership, happiness and income (because they will not be able to produce meat at a low cost or produce meat at all)