Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you view some of the single player campaign you can see the assets that they used are, what you may describe as generic.
It's not a fallacy to think that they didn't pay attention to these btw - simply that if you think from a historical p.o.v. there were generally 2 types of structures. These were older bricks and mortar and newer concrete structures.
In addition to which, most of the fighting on the eastern front was (apart from the major combat zones, like Leningrad and Stalingrad) in the country.
While it appears to be quite western front centric, a lot of these buildings and shops were quite similar, simply laid out with more space between them.
Check out old wartime and pre wartime footage regarding Russian cities and you can see the similarity between them. While form may change slightly, function is pretty similar.