Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
Are there performance improvements in animaze over facerig? I use an avatar from the facerig workshop that doesn't exist in Animaze. If nothing has changed I don't see why I would switch to Animaze but truthfully I don't know.
There is absolutely no obligation to switch if you don't want to.
On the question of which is better in 2024, we trust there's no contest :).
Even when Animaze is "handicapped" by using using the old facerig ported avatars like Fluffo (which are a bit gimped when compared to Animaze native avatars like Noah or Brutus), and limit Animaze to just the default webcam tracking, we still think the tracking looks and feels more natural on Animaze.
Take a look here:
https://youtu.be/sJ4wijtsCjM
If you then start using exclusive new Animaze features like iPhone face tracking support, support for more model formats, more trackers, VMC, and so on, and animaze-optimized avatars, then there's no comparison.
You can test the two software suites side by side, there is no cost to use the free tier of Animaze.
If you use a webcam feed splitter like ManyCam and have a decent PC, you can feed the same input video feed in both (that's how the above video was created).