Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Nah, the only reason you should think about size and scale together is that size also determines how much tank capacity the animal takes up. If you make the size small but the model really large, you'll be able to put it/many in a small tank and so it might look a bit weird.
A good tactic is to reduce the size but give it active swimmer. This means the minimum size of the tank is some multiple of the size. It doesn't stop you putting lots of the same large model in a tank, but it does at least stop the problem of a massive animal in a small tank.
PS you can set the multiple with active swimmer like this:
"activeSwimmer": {"multiplier":3},
That 3 can be whatever. IIRC it defaults to 6.