Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
* With Your suspension (stabilized by ropes) the loco max (peak) speed 43km/h, sustained speed about 36km/k. One wheel lost towards the end of the test without critically imparing the performance.
* Mine (present version): peak about 47km/h sustained about 39km/h.
Conditions: 4-8-4 Heavy with all three engines at max throttle with 50 weights in the midestion chest.
@Johnbeere: That would be unlikely. It seems that the hitboxes are flat on the top. Rather, there may be some tiny but sudden changes of angles at the section merge points due to whatever method Equinox used for calculating the geometry of sections when merging them. Splines should not cause problems but I do not know what was really used. Also there is an issue of how the simplified algorithms of the game engine handle the interacion with hitboxes. The dependence on the computer resorces points to that as a culprit.