Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
A 2x2 would require a 1x1 "combiner" graphic, to still have a 1x1 inputA, a 1x1 inputB and at least a 1x1 OutputC
A 3x3 would be better.. you could designate the top row & middle as a 1x1 'T' combiner... then have a 1x1 middle inputs left&right with the bottom row all being an output 3x1
- but it would look cramped/too condensed
A 5x5 larger version doesn't have much issues, other than trying to balance the inputs/outputs is again difficult, what tiles become which-when you need to work in/out in rectangles/squares ... and then fitting a 5x5 module itself onto ships becomes an issue
4x4 was the 'sweet spot'. Good balance of input/output and combiner. Easily swap-able and align-able with 4x4 storages.
They are intentionally 4x4 to make the design intent be used for your large factory ship.