Most players expect this roles of infantry weapons according to vanilla>
Swords and shields = decent attack/protection
Spears = anti large (no AP damage), charge defence vs large, loose to swords 1v1
Dual swords = anti infantry, no AP damage
Two handed swords and axes = AP damage
Halberds = universal weapons, AP damage, vs large +charge defence vs large, loose to greatswords 1v1
There is simple logic in that, but radious mod dont follow this rule. There is armored spearmen with AP spears (makes them OP), t5 blazing sun halberds that loose fight to t5 monsters cause they lack of AP dmg, clanrat warrios with halbers without charge defence against large, norsca warriors with ap swords and shields (makes them OP), undead halberds without antilarge bonus, etc.
I find this problematic cause i cant tell by enemy weapon icons on the battlefield which unit is which. I play legend mostly, and there is no time to click and check stats. Charge at greatwords, but they have antilarge bonus, what? Throw armored guys at simple swords, but they starting loose hp, what? Monster infantry defeat 1v1 halbers of same tier, what? It breaks user game exmperience in a bad way.
And the immersion too. I meah why clanrat spears can defend against charge of large troops, but better clanrat warrios halberds cant do the same thing? They had better training, better weapons, etc. This example can be used everywhere.
And the lack of roster. I play mostly with halberds, but everytime i see them without AP/antilarge/defence against large it makes my butt hurt. This is not halberds, this is useless scrubs without purpose i wanted. For example there is a lot of antiinfatry troops in vampire counts, and there is another copy of them like black guards with halbers without antilarge. Why do i even need them?