安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
My personal impression is that those Modules/Buildings are currently in a tuff spot. But I'm not sure if there is a good balance between buffing them (to perhaps +5 Energy per Trading Hub and +7/+8 with the Offworld Trading Company) and not making them too OP or stil being in essentially the same tuff spot where their resource output doesn't justify them taking up valuable space on limited starbases. This is also more of a nitpick but: I dislike putting more resource production into Starbases, the categories work but you for example don't just see what their purpose is when in System view (and adding an indicator for Resource production like Megastrcutures have seems to be impossible), besides their level and military strength they are blackboxes which I don't want to move too much of the economy into.
Beyond all that:
Between planetside production, mining stations in space and a Dyson Sphere - I'm kinda missing something mid sized here, like a Habitat relative to a Planet and Ring World. Making a Starbase Building/Module (combination) which fills that gap would be easy...but personally I would prefer an in-space object, which can be seen and ideally also be destroyed.
Solar Collector (Defense) Platforms should be doable (although I have no 3D modelling skills, so that would mean reuse of exsiting models) but personally I'd favor a energy collecting equivalent to the before mentioned Habitats which could be built over suns. Not sure If I'll ever persue that idea - considering my missing 3D modelling skills - but we'll see.