安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
6 
此主題已被置頂，因此它可能很重要 
檢舉此篇文章
My personal impression is that those Modules/Buildings are currently in a tuff spot. But I'm not sure if there is a good balance between buffing them (to perhaps +5 Energy per Trading Hub and +7/+8 with the Offworld Trading Company) and not making them too OP or stil being in essentially the same tuff spot where their resource output doesn't justify them taking up valuable space on limited starbases. This is also more of a nitpick but: I dislike putting more resource production into Starbases, the categories work but you for example don't just see what their purpose is when in System view (and adding an indicator for Resource production like Megastrcutures have seems to be impossible), besides their level and military strength they are blackboxes which I don't want to move too much of the economy into.
Beyond all that:
Between planetside production, mining stations in space and a Dyson Sphere - I'm kinda missing something mid sized here, like a Habitat relative to a Planet and Ring World. Making a Starbase Building/Module (combination) which fills that gap would be easy...but personally I would prefer an in-space object, which can be seen and ideally also be destroyed.
Solar Collector (Defense) Platforms should be doable (although I have no 3D modelling skills, so that would mean reuse of exsiting models) but personally I'd favor a energy collecting equivalent to the before mentioned Habitats which could be built over suns. Not sure If I'll ever persue that idea - considering my missing 3D modelling skills - but we'll see.