安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Excal is so saturated with skins, it's becoming a joke. A joke that you should ignore. "Oh yea, just another Excal skin. Nothing to see here people, move along."
The talent here is obvious. But the character is a meme at this point and not worth investing in.
I don't think it's called criticism if your "critique" is just "nobody should want this because there are already skins for Excalibur." You aren't talking about the good and bad points of the skin, just that it shouldn't exist in your opinion, which is not at all criticism.
There is no reason to attack a content creator for making a skin for any frame they want. If you think the market for Excalibur skins is over saturated and you want skins for specific frames then make them yourself, don't shoot down peoples work just because you can't see the value in it.
I'm voting yes just coz of this