安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
If I may add my opinion about this. I'm 100% on board with the oil wells, oil wells and coal and iron are candidates that can make the map really feel overcrowded, and it's not easy to balance this without making things too easy or to cheap to achieve, but senseless definitly needs some fine tuning from 1900 onwards, really like the idea with the 2 lvl oil well.
I think slaughterhouse and forrests are fine as they are, if the slaughterhouse would get nerfed it would not sum up nicely with the livestock farms and I have no porblem with a slaughterhouse fully supporting a food processing plant, I also like that it has another feel to the food chain compared too grain and milk.
Regarding forrests, my fear is that, giving them to much production would simplify the supply of sawmills too much because you would only need one forrest for one sawmill and personally I wouldn't like that.