安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Normally mass can be a useful indicator for blunt damage and sharp tends to follow value. But I can see modded material use that might not follow these kinds of conventions, be it material or design properties of the item that need a more attuned selection. And the only consideration not to add too many filters, is just that, to maintain a sensible use with numbers of selections.
But, I think those two stats are simply beneficial to include, so happy to add them in.
Work time/amount is attributable from the recipeDef or bill rather than the materials used.
Though for blueprint use or building defs, where you are constructing there are adjustments based on the material stats. Hence I can understand why you'd think it could similarly apply to bills.