Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
... well, I suppose Herakleios had some ideas.
I think I'd add in a not BYZ requirement. Greeks could still form it with that, but not the surviving part of the Roman Empire.
Africa and Maghreb region were very different parts of the continent during Antiquity, simply because the Sahara desert was to big to allow people to travel through it. So they were more related to the Greeks than the Africans or even Egyptians.
Carthaginians & canaans were semitic people originating in the region of Palestine, from linguistics to religion and so on semitic. In other words the closest thing ingame would be either hebrew in the lost cultures category or from other cultures literally arabic. The next closest one would be Tamazight or berbers as while they were not semitic in any shape, they did intermarry & berber languages adopted some canaanite vocabulary.
I think Tunis (should be renamed "Ifriqiya") could be allowed to form it, but under the current conditions this would mean they'd always form Carthage unless territorial requirements are upped such that the tag would have to expand outwards enough..