Total War: WARHAMMER II

Total War: WARHAMMER II

[DEPRECATED, USE VCO2 INSTEAD] Victory Conditions Overhaul
This topic has been locked
Wolfy  [developer] 10 Jun, 2020 @ 10:35am
High Elves Victory Conditions
Place here your suggestions to improve the High Elves Victory Conditions
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
[HISP]Cochus 10 Jun, 2020 @ 1:43pm 
Yvresse victory points are far more expansionist than the others. 18 provinces is a lot of provinces.
cybvep 10 Jun, 2020 @ 11:15pm 
For Tyrion, requring the unification of Ulthuan and destruction of both Naggarond and Cult of Pleasure seems like too much for short victory. It will be a very long game, especially since these DE factions tend to get big and strong, as well as they love to confederate. IMO it could be changed to destruction of either Naggarond or Cult of Pleasure, with a new requirement for control of Naggaroth. That way the player won't have to chase the DE everywhere if the DE capital is controlled and at least 1 major DE faction is destroyed.

Nagarythe starts closer to the DE and Alith Anar is hell-bent on the destruction of Malekith, so in his case for short victory the destruction of Cult of Pleasure could be replaced with with the destruction of Naggarond and control of Naggaroth.

Why should Eltharion care for the control of Marshes of Madness? Seems random to me. Control 18 provinces objective for long victory doesn't seem appropriate as well. IMO long victory should require the destruction of all starting Greenskins factions in the Old World instead. Destruction of Naggarond is also not necessary IMO, as long as Ulthuan is under HE control. GS focus is what makes Eltharion unique. He should be encouraged to go east, not west.
Last edited by cybvep; 10 Jun, 2020 @ 11:17pm
Wolfy  [developer] 11 Jun, 2020 @ 11:03pm 
I have created a main discussion post for each raze. Please move all your suggestions there.
< >
Showing 1-3 of 3 comments
Per page: 1530 50