安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Failing that, yes, if you die all the time it means the die was cast before you've made the save.
Or you could, you know, concede defeat. I am not teaching you how to have fun, just explaining myself. As it stands now, the Hunt is pretty much a head on assault on a being far far more powerful than yourself. Devs, in my opinion, are already too generous with chances for this kind of foolhardy enterprise to succeed.
Not saying there are no reasons to go hunting against all odds, for personal reasons or for "the greater good". I never fail to invent those myself, but my excuse is that I always end playthrough no matter the outcome. Young/pseudo third is a questionable badge of recognition for those desperate and/or stupid.
If you want to change it, you would have to reload months before.
They ate 2nd gens so of course they can be diablerized in turn. Scenarios for hunts are plausable too, but I feel their risks are underepresented. I mean, most of the bookmarked and clan-recommended characters would probably wait for better opportunity. You know, long-winded centuries-long plot rather than charging butt-naked into unknown.
Some would charge, no doubt. Out of duty, temper, grief, greed, derangement, all of the above. I don't play those beyond meeting their major objectives, they are too restrictive/boring/uncomfortable to drag for centuries waiting for event. But it would be not unrealistic for one of them to succeed.