Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But one thing, it should have some more m-hangars - it's a huge carrier. But only 2 m-docks??
There is place enough for smart and hull integratet m-docks around the ship (at top, at bottom, or into the 3 tubes at the side left & right). Anyway, some mooore please, then it will be perfect! :)
The side tubes on the other hand contain 1 M launch tube each so I cannot put any pads there (although this would allow for rapid deployment of mediums using the Fleet commands).
P. e. 2 Arawn can dock at the bottom, some L ships alongside the shipline and thean they can go piggyback with the Kyoto. ..something in that way.
In such case more M-docks were obsolete - you have 2 sub-carriers and some frigates in your pocket ;))
Edit:
Maybe an issue: I stand at the docks and watch the Katana docking. It was 'interesting'. They don't dock, they are more breakdancing to its landing platform ^^.
And it takes too long time. I think to adjust the flypath should solve the problem. But I don't have any knowlegde about the landing path/-process of ships.
And when the Katana has docked and goes down to intern storage, it flys some minutes in the intern of Kyoto aroud (to find its final destination?).
https://forum.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=269847
Especially his Valahalla seems to be much better than the original one.
I made some (imo usefull) changes at S-docks, M-docks (see my post above) and turretbattery splittng. If you want, you are welcome to integrate this into your mod.
btw: In combination with my additional cap- and m-weapons it results in a very nice flaggship.
Sure, feel free to go with what you think is best
Here is a suggestion for the next Kyoto update:
From my point of view it would be good to integrate or adopt my version of the turret battery splitting. This way you have more independent batteries available and thus the possibility to fight several targets at the same time - especially with the M-Turrets for fighter defense.
I used your turret groupings for both versions :)