Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Also as a way to bypass the negative daily forest harmony, I found that storing dryads as garrison and then taking a bunch of them at a time to the Oak of ages to retire allows for purchasing upgrades from the tree, forest harmony upkeep doesn't make them abandon the party if they're not "paid" which is nice. No chance in keeping 1500 harmony for no debuffs, but at least there's a way to keep upgrading.
What for me always was/is the most annoying mechanic of BL (of the many annoying things which are lacking), was the arbitrariness concerning territory. Seeing the AI taking castles somewhere away while an owned town nearby was sieged is terrible in my opinion. It would be so great if you could give a preference to defense and define settlements as core to keep.
If even your team which made this fantastic mod has found no way to code this, all hope is lost, isn't it?