Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский — Испания)
Español - Latinoamérica (испанский — Латинская Америка)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский — Португалия)
Português-Brasil (португальский — Бразилия)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
is that good enough?
Little late i know.
By the design of this mission, I think a logical hardcore rethinking of this mission would be to really dig in the idea of the forward observer role:
- drop the player only with the binoculars, and let him call artillary fire by the map coordinates, not with the point and 0-8-... gameplay;
- Arm him with no optics on the MX, to demotivate sniping. Explosives, sure, if he's really up on the close and personal;
- if the enemy is in hold of an airbase, the player should be inserted via boat. I suppose the skies would be watched and guarded;
- if you say the whole of stratis is in csat hands, where is the artillary fire coming from? instead of land platforms, death could be dealt by gunships, or airstrikes.