Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It wasn't that weak when it gives this production and food yield to all desert tiles, even if regular tiles were becoming like plains. But that was more of an upgrade to them, when they had no base yield.
Yes, tundra receives forests to bump up their total yield value by 1, but deserts receive the same in the form of oases. Only, the bonus is focused onto 1 tile because it would look odd seeing many oases the way forests are distributed.
Deserts receive bonus, strategic, and luxury resources just like tundra.
Deserts can be improved just like tundra.
Desert hills provide the same amount of yields as tundra hills -- snow has none.
I could go on and get deeper...
No. The cold equivalent of Desert is not Tundra, but Snow. Snow has no yields and is generally even more useless than Desert. Tundra can also have Forests, which the other two can't.
...I hate Tundra... in a recent game I founded my capital in Tundra and it ended up having half the population of all my other cities >_>