Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I see, you also got addicted to fast accelerating and strafing vessels like I am ;-)
https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1121581652
If you check the MKIII (or the MKII) version, you'll see similar performance but with way less RCS and Thruster usage. The reason like you already said is, they're smaller and much lighter.
This Fighter is meant as a somewhat real-size Heavy-Attack-Fighter, not one small Kids-Toy ;-)
A Fighter I take out in Survival to conquer a complete World on Hard Difficulty
(that is 1) Destroy PV, capture PV-Base, Remove all turrets from all POIs. then if I'm in the mood capture the Drone Base too, or get my CV BASE STAR down to the planet first and then capture that Base.) without worrying I could loose...
When I compare the MKI against this... oh my... Kids Toy... really... haha ;-)
The Mark III is still a very very good Combat Fighter... but this new Mark V has more Weapons ;-)