Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
One of them us supposed to be a "jack of all trades - perfect in nothing" alternative, good in every scenario but not perfect in any of them, mainly for the units that are just as often faced with armored as unarmored opposing forces. How they did it was to slightly curve the blade and make the end just a bit straighter than the curve in the blade.
And the other one, the traditional weabo was a curved blade that was ONLY used for opposing forces wearing no armor. It is also the most traditional variant.
ANYWAY that's why you often see samurai (or any unit) with multiple blades because all of them were very situational.
AwW mAn.
It is true that swords the excel in cutting have curved blades
@Tnamrod is half right, they are curved to excel in cutting but it is chinese(according to google)
@Lesbian Supreme I am not a nerd because I googled all the stuff
lol