Subscribe to download
Selectable C-65115

CAN U MAKE IT FOR ONE POINT?

That's because at some point of time in-game truck had some stat changes. This mod was identical to vanilla tuck at from early versions.

I was driving around and testing this when I found that this mod version is heavier and a bit slower than the games c-65115. It feels, sluggish while the ingame one feels very fast.

@Marck That's great! Nice to see that you care about the mod :)

@Galaxian Thanks for the heads-up. The mod is now updated to match the current state of the stock C-65115.

The original one found in the maps can carry long logs and so has the long log cart capability. This one does not have that. Would it be possible to add that option to make this as similar to the original one as possible?

thanks i wanted it :)

1) Rather keep 1 b.p. (balance point). If I remember numbers right C256 has 150k power units and C65115 have 160k units, but 256 has better traction thanks to diff. lock.
2) I often have fun crossing river on "Crossing" with this truck, while it has very powerful engine, it's drivetrain is still similar to C65111, which is rather pathetic. It translates into huge fuel consumption for an RWD truck (up to 25-30L/min, comparable to loaded AWD truck). Got these values while driving along south river bank with loaded Carriage With Crane (CWC) and on 3rd-4th gears. It's 350 L capacity ain't improve things much comparing to C256's 330 L.

3) Said drivetrain can't hold much load and has drastic speed drop when loaded. And that on tarmac ring road. For example: it can reach ~90 km/h by being fully stripped, but can't get over 4th gear (~20-25 km/h) with loaded CWC and cart. Any other truck in C*** tier, including C256 (may be except weakest in tier 65111) has better performance under same load.
4) Few words about tires "flatties vs biggies". Flat tires has better traction on untouched ground with high chances to NOT dig it if it has traction but off-road tires are prone to dig it. That may explain better performance in Proving ground, while "off-road" tires is better at crawling through deep and/of soft soils.

So with the C-65115 we have the situation that it uses highway wheels and neither all-wheel drive nor differential lock but has more powerful motor settings than the C-65111. Would you agree that it is not a good idea to use only 1 balance point because that would set it on the same level with the C-256 (which seems wrong to me), and therefore 2 balance points could be seen as a good compromise?