Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- I wish KSP2 would provide those with less impact on PC performance XD
I think one important reason hindering such crafts from being popular is their complexity. They are a hell to design and also a hell to operate, both for me and for my PC (yeah I mean the part count). On the other hand, going far beyond Kerbin system or lifting massive payload might be rather rare activities. Therefore, such crafts might not be easy to enjoy, both for designers and users. They will receive high respect from those who understand them, but front page seems to welcome rather simple stuff to have fun with.
However I believe that we shouldn't build crafts with the goal in mind that it has to hit front page...And a nice SSTA remains my ultimate goal.