Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://pastebin.com/0v4JtcYF
I think that's about it? If happen by while I'm thinking about it again, I'll let you know. Making some decent strides with this one. Hopefully, you understand that my input is meant as constructive criticism and not random trolling. Keep up the good work.
5. State health programs actually do drive innovation. Well, public research funding does. In the last 30 years, the U.S. government has poured millions into pharmaceutical research and now we have several ways to combat HIV and AIDS, less invasive treatments for cancer, early detection capabilities for cancer and other ailments, and many other advances in medical science that are paid for by the taxpayers and then sold back to them for egregious profits.
-- Recommended fix: regulated private pensions would have an impact on equality, so keep it. Private housing DECREASES equality.
-- Recommended fix: look at Japan and base your model on that.