Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
Specifically here, it would mean downgrading the highway between the offramp and the onramp to only be 2 lanes, so that the 3-lane highway ends up with 2 lanes for going straight and 1 lane for going off, rather than having the rightmost lane be able to do two things. And similarly at the merge point, a 2-lane highway plus the 1-lane onramp going to a 3-lane highway means no conflicts because all the incoming lanes have their own outgoing lane.
There is one small thing I don't understand: what do you mean by writing: "Lane Math'd", what does that mean?
Some minor tweak suggestions:
- it's great that the western interchange is Lane Math'd; you should do it on the trumpet in the start square too. (Maybe even have the roads into the start square just be 2-lane highways.)
- the most-southern branch of the river around the islands is a bit stop-start. I think it needs to be a bit deeper in the upstream part, or shallower over the whole thing to go more intentionally for the swampy feel on the whole channel.
- consider softening the terrain a bit around the western interchange.