安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
1) I don't see any reason for detour points. They are for large buildings with intense inside traffic, and this is not the case here. Overdesigning
2) But I suspect that the main problem is the order of $VEHICLE_STATION, and detour points could be kept. Haven't tested it
3) The plant is actually designed one-way. If it is placed backwards, the vehicles turn around at entering and exiting. Two-way road connections are misleading.
But one-way road connections don't allow through passage.
If the plant stays two-way, then I think it could have some sign (arrow etc.) which side is the actual entrance
4) I'm still not sure that two road entrances is a good design. One could place two simple asphalt plants side by side to have the same result and avoid all this headache. Two plants take more space though.
In my experience, better design is T-shaped, like Oneway Concrete Plant in https://steamhost.cn/steamcommunity_com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2390566554
My testing shows that when
1) $STATION_NOT_BLOCK_DETOUR_POINT and $STATION_NOT_BLOCK_DETOUR_POINT_PID removed
2) Order of $VEHICLE_STATION is switched
3) Plant is facing correctly (to CO)
then it works correctly.
But I'm not sure that I tested thoroughly enough