Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you care about lore, then it obviously wrong. Who didnt betray Yuan Shu once he pro claimed Emperor in the novel? Although he plays a important role during 190 till his death
Yuan Shu is relying less on the opinions of a failing Han rule and leaning more on his own infrastructure.
Not every faction needs to play the same.
Yuan Shu was a (dim-witted) villain and his goal in-game should not be to masterfully the Han into believing that he is their best friend.
The Legitimacy/support that Yuan Shu receives from his neighbors come from bribes. They are likely not made in earnest.
Opportunistic warlords will take coin and say what Yuan Shu wants them to say until later.
Cao Cao was a manipulator. Liu Xie went willingly to Cao Cao's capital where he would later find himself stuck.
Cao Cao maneuvered himself into the Prime Minister position and used it to make decrees on the Emperor's behalf.
Low Legitimacy could be interpreted as Yuan Shu appearing as a nice, loyal supporter of the Han.
As his Legitimacy grows, so too does his brazenness and impudence.