Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I look forward to the new module! Keyframe animation is far easier than math based - it's why computer animators switched to that system decades ago!
It gets VERY complicated, VERY fast, even for someone with a math background like me.
The OP's graphs are an attempt to do some of this work; they show the displacement of x vs. t and y vs. t for a number of paths and velocities. It doesn't do much good to show the actual motion, though.
I mostly use it to move items in simple curves, or move two items at once on an object.
Say you want to direct a locomotive around a fixed radius curve of 10 meter radius. You will need two of these modules:
One for the x-direction (forward and back), and rotation.
One for the y-direction (up and down), no rotation required.
1-A becomes the start point of the locomotive. 1-B is the end point in the X direction and rotation of 90 degrees.
2-A is the start point of the locomotive.
2-B is the end point in the Y direction.
Delays and times to transit should be the same in both modules, or you'll get a parabola, not a circular curve.
This should allow the engine to transit the curve.