Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Something like this would be perfect for IE. Making factions like Naggarond, Eataine, Hexoatl, Reikland, Sylvania, Karaz-a-Karak, Goldtooth, Grimgors Aardboys, Khemri, Couronne, Disciples of Hashut, Clan Skryre, Warhost of the Apocalypse etcetc have more bonuses so that you end up with "lore friendly" great empires that make abit more sense.
It's not that CA has done anything particularly wrong with IE's potential. I'm just considering giving it additional difficulty potential in IE as well.