Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Please make sure all of you have the 1.3.30a (with the a at the end) version. Steam can be a bit janky when it comes to auto-updating mods and it's not always clear what the eact problem is, but your error is most likely caused by the issue I just described above.
Any clue why this would be happening (game crash at startup) for specifically TWO people using it in a collection and not the other TWO? We've already gone through the full reinstall/resubscribe/clear cache shuffle so it's not a "some of us got the update and some didn't" issue.
Saturnium will be added later due to currently incorrect pricing which I want to fix first.
You're doing a self-imposed 1 ship run and are currently in the starter system.
Once you progress through the tiers you will find that the 250 raw resources storages will become much more conventient, especially if you also use other mods that increase the amount of drops.
I'm not going to make changes to the core values of this mod just so you can have an easier time in your self-imposed 1-ship limit in the starter system.
Thank you for using my mods and have a nice day :)
Regarding the ammo storages though, I'll consider it. I think this is actually a good idea and I think the need is there.
I will see what I can come up with.
@A single communist: Tbh your suggestion seems rather convoluted compared to the existing solution, let alone that retroactively changing the contents of these storages will also affect already build storages and depending on whether the contents increases or decreases, many people might find themselves getting the short end of the stick.
On top of that I'd need to put effort into this (what I see as a non-benefitial) project at the cost of the other projects I'd have to postpone.
I use these 250 storages all the time and 250 for raw resources doesn't bother me. I use the 250 storages a lot more than the 50 storages btw. Anything under 250 for raw resources I'll just store in standard open storages for my factories to consume. The 50-sized storages are usually only use for small transport ships.
Sorry, but don't count on me implementing your current suggestion :)
The exact numbers are:
40-stack: 2000 medium, 10000 large (same as currently)
20-stack: 1000 medium, 5000 large (can stay as-is, but would feel much better to use)
10-stack: 480/400 medium, 2160/2000 large (first one is according to "6 stacks per storage", second is "5 stacks because that's close enough and the numbers look better that way")
5-stack: 240/200 medium, 1200/1000 large (ditto)
It should be a simple numbers tweak in the stats and description, but, if I'm wrong, please, tell me.
Iron plates, coils, hypercoils, and everything else that stacks to 40 can stay the same (250/storage, a tad more then 6 stacks)
Hyperium is the only thing I know of that stacks to 20, so dropping the base to 125 will bring it to balance with 40-stacks. (Can stay as-is, as 12 stacks of hyperium is not too much space taken up before you can compact it)
Enriched uranium/letanium stacks to 10, so it's 60 per storage (can be dropped to 50 to make the numbers look nicer, it's still close enough)
Finally, all ores, processors and diamonds stack to 5. Their small storages can store 30 (same compression rate as iron plates) or 25 (for the nice numbers).
(Screw the character limit, will have to split the message)