Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You are not intended to use the phase 1 road re-arm in the FA-26 version. This is due to balance, since the F/A-26 has such a high weapons capacity. Your RTB point should not set to the road re-arm. The units are prespawned and the flare system is residual. Nothing in the mission should be telling you that you can use it in the Wasp version.
We only managed to complete Phase 1 as we were both getting to grips with the game, but we'll be giving things another try. Thanks for all the effort with this!
P.S. I hope we get radio comms sometime soon. Would love to have the added immersion.
2). No - Randomized conditions are carefully designed to not create near-unbeatable scenarios. Not only would people complain about the transit times (A-10 slow), but certain final-mission threats would make a win astronomically difficult if you only have an A-10. I would rather make a brand new mission for the A-10 specifically.
3). Maybe - I'm finishing updating an older SP campaign designed for the A-10. I'm not sure how fun KB II would be while flying the A-10 (see above), but i could always add it as an option for those who wish to subject themselves to it.