Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This would add risk, lore depth, and a unique gameplay twist to experimenting with early vaccines.
I had a lore-friendly idea: could hazmat zombies with antidotes spawn more frequently the longer the game goes on? It makes sense that early in the outbreak there wouldn't be many (or any) scientists in the field yet. But weeks into the apocalypse, it would be believable that field teams were deployed into the infected zones, bringing antidotes and becoming infected themselves.
Also, maybe rare mobile science camps or underground labs could spawn — already overrun and dangerous, but offering high-value loot and more narrative flavor.
Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks again for your work!
Even just the following would do:
Zomboxycycline (Preventative)
Zomboxolone (Palliative)
Zomboxivir (curative)
As such, I set the preventative to 75%, the delay meds to 20% and cure to only 5% ^^