Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Never downloaded this either for some reason. It’s interesting to look back and see your now-ancient attempts at reworking your very first puzzles, comparing how much you’d matured as a mapmaker then to how mature you are now!
The one change I DID like was that you put grates on the side of the lane where the bridge eventually runs through. Makes working with the lasers a LOT easier. (Though, these days in BEE2 I believe you can turn off laser collision anyways.)
Difficulty: 6.25/10
Design: 8/10
Enjoyed: 6.75/10
This time I didn't use the "grab the cube through the fizzler" solution.
Hint: hard part is the beginning portion, after figuring it out the rest can be autopilot through; the original cannot be done that way but that is b/c the shortcoming of original.
respawn the cube is part of solution.
no Faith Plate implies... yeah that is it.
non-cardinal direction is needed for lasering.
I appreciate some changes that as you said made the test easier to execute but I still prefer the original since small chambers generally don't need you running around to figure out the solution, and the final design tends to be better. Also, I fell less forgiving on myself when I can't solve a small room test haha, which is why I tend to appreciate more those, since I feel like it's harder to make more challenging tests on small rooms.