Make sure the starters can crank up the engine above 2 RPS, otherwise it will stall regardless of the output values on the manifolds.

It seems like this controller stopped working for no reason at all. Ive connected air and fuel manifolds and they dont recieve any signal

ok, it worked

Try to add more cylinders, or use my clutch controller .

everything is connected. I triple checked. There is a clamp on the clutch (.45) and the gearbox is set to 9:5. It's a 3 cylinder engine and the car weighs 80

Make sure you connected the blue composite node to engine cylinder, and if your engine is powerful enough for the torque load.

When I use this in my cars and stuff, when at max throttle, the rps goes down and the engine dies. When I let go of the gas, the rps skyrockets to the max I set it to.

Make sure the starters can crank up the engine above 2 RPS, otherwise it will stall regardless of the numbers on the manifolds.

Send me the workshop link or the vehicle xml on which this controller is bugged.

Its not outputing anything for some reason

Just tested, it works fine as before. You can send me the workshop link to the vehicle with that issue.

So, this is a new issue.

I've used this on so many of my creations before that I know the MEC like the back of my hand, how to tune it for my builds, etc... But on my most recent project, the Air/Fuel outputs are broken? They dont output a value no matter what, and I'm lost as to the reason. I've set everything up as it should (even made sure the whole engine is connected), but looking at the manifolds and the MC, its clear its the MC but I have no clue whats going on. Any help?

i thinki figured out why it happends, maby. the problem may be that it onley happends when its under load, beacause i was running the engine without the boat and it was running fine, also after it reaches this downwoards spiral its imposable to get out of

it works fine for a bit, but then it shits the bed by sudenly droping rpm and the will struggle keeping the rps up and the air intake and feul intake throttle go wild

Really? After some testing I saw that 0.3 stoich. gives you the most power, and 15AFR gives me the most efficiency without losing too much power.

The stoichiometry value is just the AFR with the engine temperature taken into account, and is preferable to adjust over a simple AFR. The engine has maximum performance at 0.5 stoichiometry and maximum fuel efficiency at 0.2 stoichiometry.

0.3 Stoich gives you the absolute MOST POWER out of your engine with this ECU. 15.0 AFR gives you the MOST EFFICIENCY out of your engine.

Yes, in terms of tuning the engine stoichiometry it is basically the same.

Ngl i have no idea how youu can comprehend this enough to make your own controller out of it but credits to you. question tho, is the guide called "MODULAR ENGINES: Perfect Stoichiometry" not doing the same thing?

There is a basic equation for temperature, afr, and stoichiometry in this guide , but i took the derived formulas from the Penatoliy's controller .

looking at the code in the controller, how did you come up with these equations for mixtures and stuff. is there a guide you can reference or are you a math genius?

@combatsmithen, no, except for the RPS values.

Turbocharge! Turbocharge! Turbocharge!

If I AM pumping air into the manifold. Will changing anything provide any benefits?

Yes.

Can I turbo charge my engines with this controller?

thanks

Yeah that would work but I mean by changing the fuel ratio

Engine performance is not affected by its temperature, but you can warm up the engine quickly by revving it on high RPS without torque load.

This is nice but I wish it had a way of making the engine hot quickly when it's cold other than that I love this MC

I love this for boats lol

The maximum engine performance is on 0.5, the maximum fuel efficiency is on 0.2, but the difference is negligibly small.

Amazing ECU but i have a question. Ive tried adding in an eco mode and power mode by adjusting the stoichiometry to 0.3 and 0.7. Through a quick google search i found lower values = less power/more eco but weirdly enough from my crude timed tests it was somehow faster and the opposite is true for higher values. Any reason behind this? If it matters i have 2 air intakes and RPS limited to 16

it still works but you have to mess with the settings other wise the best engine micro controller around.

Yes.

No.

I think this is broken

I see, i was concerned for a moment, lol. But in the end it is simply a bit above my paygrade it appears

The are hooked inside the LUA script with functions property.getNumber()

Why are none of the settings you can change hooked into anything?

@Robert.4987 yes, at lower stoichiometry the engine consumes more air.

can i use this on my creations if i link it?

Hey youve probably heard this question alot but i couldnt find any question that fitted myself.
So i want to use Less fuel and more air but im stupid and dont really know how to fix it.

So if my stoichiometry is at 0.2 i believe it uses more air and less fuel instead of the 0.5

Is this correct or the opposite way?

Try to resubscribe on it.

it doesnt though

It should appear in the inventory and in the workshop microcontrollers tab.

it doesnt appear anywhere? i cant find it at all ive tried everything

Doesnt work :(

This is 1000 times better than the chip I made. I mean my chip worked but... it was choppy and made the engine feel like crap. Yours is just perfect

Ahh okay thank you