Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
E.g. No Goofy Portraits
There are actually 208 playable vanilla species portraits, this mod excludes only 36 (= 17.3%).
Want a funny perspective on creation?
Look at fictional characters in a fictional plot.
They'll have memories, "knowledge" of history and an entire civilization they share that "history" with, while in fact they are two pages old and started "existing" within their world on the same morning that their plot started, right alongside that said world.
For all we know that could easily be us.
But that's beyond the point and frankly a bit to much philosophy for a simple comment thread.
It's the same base idea as in stellaris - not wanting something that's about to pop up in your backyard to go "die! vile xeno-scum!" on you. So you shape their ideas of what's vile and what isn't.
At least that's a possibility, which was the point.
Also "history" of millions of years is a joke. Even our actual "recorded" history is just that - a collection of records made by who-knows-who who-knows-when and who-knows-why. And all that we like to believe that we "know" about evolution and such are merely theories with zero actual proof behind them. 100% serious here, btw. Evolution theory is being put in the centre of nothing short of a pseudo-scientific sham. The theory itself is valid but purely as a theory. It's current "flagman position" in our culture is not due to it's brilliance or accuracy or any other kind of merit. It's due to the fact that the scientific community chose to promote it.
@Reianor: I'm with you, that's a point, but very small. :-P That's another reason why I not fully removed the species. Mutation or subspecies is fully fine and reasonable, but that's another story.
Our species has a replicable history of millions of years (which makes it very unlikely that help from outside was provided, maybe apart from the last 10000 years).
It's the quirk itself that bugs me.
The selectiveness of a human mind never ceases to bewilder me.
Stellaris itself is inspired by human fantasy.
The very ideas that space is the next frontier or that there is intelligent life in space is nothing but a human fantasy at this point.
Sure enough, it IS a possible development.
But what do we actually KNOW about that possible development?
What could we possibly know about something that has never happened to any of us before?
Yet we already have our own notions about it like "there can be no space dwarves".
I dunno if it's funny or worryingly short-sighted of us.
Consider the following for a sec.
Have you ever heard the theories of earth's culture having alien influence.
Not a huge fan of that theory myself, but it's not something that easy to disprove.
Now tell me can you actually be sure that those "fantasies" of ours aren't direct result of such influence?
And if that's the case then we'd actually be MORE likely to encounter things planted into our imagination than something completely unfathomable.
Just a simple thought for you to consider before you decide you know what alien lifeforms can or cannot be like.