Cosmoteer: Starship Architect & Commander

Cosmoteer: Starship Architect & Commander

Ω Extended Tech Tree Mod - Letalium Addon
8 Comments
SirCampalot  [author] 1 Jul, 2024 @ 12:32pm 
Version 1.1.0 supports Cosmoteer 0.26.2.
Previous versions of Cosmoteer will no longer work with this mod due to changes in how asteroids are spawned.
the Big Cheems 29 Jul, 2023 @ 2:04pm 
also from what i can understand the scientist part kinda confirms the subatomic particle theory by implying scientists have looked into them. again not the arbiter of grammatical understanding.
the Big Cheems 29 Jul, 2023 @ 2:00pm 
huh, fair enough. if i get the time i might try to calculate what a heavier isotope of letalium might be and if not i propose letalium-777 to keep the bible theme going.

also i would add "by some outside of scientific circles" or something like that as your logic is sound it just wasnt too clear to me (not that im the arbiter of language comprehension im a dumbass)
SirCampalot  [author] 28 Jul, 2023 @ 2:08pm 
And I actually don't mind the nitpicking as such. I actually like it as it will make my own language skills only better.

The only thing I don't want is to have the feedback swarmed with topics that have nothing to do with the mod itself as that would require too much maintenance and would make things too cluttered for my taste.
SirCampalot  [author] 28 Jul, 2023 @ 2:08pm 
@the Big Cheems:
About the theorized/presumed, I think presumed isn't actually that wrong, even though theorized may actually be a bit better. But (and please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not a native english speaker) as scientists are specifically mentioned a bit later in the text, this does imply that whoever is doing the presuming is thus not one of these scientists and people who aren't scientists will usually presume based on what they heard (like how we as non-scientsists may presume something is a certain way by watching some 'scientific' youtube program).
So I believe presume is actually correct based on its location within the text as scientsist are only introduced later, thus are unlikely to be included before their mention so I think presume is actually correct.
SirCampalot  [author] 28 Jul, 2023 @ 1:58pm 
@the Big Cheems:
I thought a bit about what you said. Long story short: even if you're technically correct, it isn't really very relevant as the main focus of this game is gameplay.
It's a bit similar to why it isn't very relevant what exactly tritanium and hyperium are and why there is an invisible wall at the edge of every star system and why do we have to jump using these gates? What exactly is hyper jumping? How does that even work?
Why is space ammo made using only sulfur and why is steel made of only iron even if we actually do have carbon?
Why do we need people carrying batteries?

It's true that all these may be technically less correct, but it's a game design choice in the end.

Having said that, thank you for yor feedback, I will take it into account as it wouldn't hurt to make the lore I write maybe a little bit more consistent or something.
the Big Cheems 28 Jul, 2023 @ 1:30pm 
how do you enrich it if theres only one isotope (666)? uranium in enriched by increasing the amount of 235 over 238 so is there a heavier letalium.
also grammar nitpick you should say "theorised" instead of "presumed" as "presumed" just doesn't fit when talking about theoretical science.
SirCampalot  [author] 28 Jun, 2023 @ 9:16am 
Version 1.0.1 updates the supported game version. No gameplay changes.