@Jfx2 im no way angry at you but just let the man do it own thing the sehrman is still good but the horizontal stabilizer dosent belong there and the "best sherman on the ws" but let the man do its own thing hes burnt out too

For the exterior, all I chose were these schematics, I looked at it and was like "my Sherman may be out of scale, but from the looks of it, it looks pretty good." It's only my third tank, how could I know any different? That proper top speed can be achieved simply by gearing down, sometimes replica speed isn't what would satisfy a lot of people.

While it sounds weird, although given 0-10 scoring, depending on the person reviewing, it's treated more so like 5-10 or a much heavier rating. And again, it's my third tank, it all seems alright to me? How many tanks have you made? Probably much more than I ever did.

I didn't make the stabilizer either, nor did I know that information on how to make one. And now I know for next time.

When why do you claim "Exterior Credibility: 9/10, Interior Credibility: 7/10, Performance Credibility: 9/10"

7/10 is in no way a "low rating"

A vertical stabilizer is as follows, Vertical Input & Tilt Sensor go into a Function 3 block, with the function "x+y*4"

In reference to stabilizers and WW2 tanks, a "stabilizer" indicates Vertical stabilization unless its specified to be "2 plane stabilization"

I don't know what I'm doing when it comes to tanks at all

And the person who told me the Sherman was stabilized, who also challenged me to make one, never specified, and I also have no way of understanding that minimized Lua block the stabilizer sits in.

Here's where marketing comes in, I said "one of the best".
Which spot on the list of the best is it? We don't know, it's just "one" on there. There's better Shermans than mine.
And this is my third tank? Yeah. Notice how I marked my own interior credibility low as well.

This is all really nit-picky, but I dont feel like you can claim to have the "best sherman on the workshop" if it just isnt.

I mean it looks alright, but in no way realistic

This model of sherman just doesnt exist. Idk why you decided to make a small hatch 75 HVSS M4A3 with a late M4A1 engine deck??

The suspension and hull MG port look good, but its not really realistic otherwise

In the inside, you can't really call it "realistic" if it only has 2 turret crew members. It also goes much faster than it should by around 10 kph, which isn't terrible but its not realistic in any way.

But my main gripes are with the fire control, which has a horizontal stabilizer for some reason?? The sherman as we all know famously had a Vertical stabilizer, but it did not, nor did it have the capacity, for a horizontal stabilizer. Also, the reticle is completely innaccurate.

Im confused as to why you labelled the machine gun boxes as 12.86? The M2 was in 12.7x99/.50 BMG. And also you only labelled some of the drums for the main gun

mf got that horizontal stabilizer

now make fury