Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
If you have low prestige, negative stability or are bankrupt, why would your people keep such an awful leader ?
Plus, having a high navy tradition could lead to electing more likely a diplomat, while having an unowned core or high military tradition would rather lead to a military election (though still randoms, only using this as factors)
Thus, the leader election would not be a player choice, but rather a random choice largely influenced by your carrier. if you have been a good ruler, you have good chances to be elected again with +1 +1 +1, but if you have not, your people are likely to banish you.
The missing localization messages should be fixed now as well @Accolade
1.16?
You're essentially giving republics a massive buff to MP.
how works with ironman?