Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
- bland good, or bland bad?
- it never really is good or bad.
- it appeals to all taste?
- sure, but usually people sometimes like the unknown, unexpected and even.....
- little bit of chaos!
I hope this inspires you :)
and yes, there is no quantitative data and I think that by doing a survey you are starting to take it way to serious for 1 simple workshop submission out of 147.000 there are out there.
I think the white pain in this gun itself is too minimalistic.
Take your deag (as your most successfull gun), it has paint on 30-40% of the gun, and it is in a place where you see it ---- constantly.
as far as the casе "of some people", let me remind you that you are looking at qualitative data. If you want to be sure about the notion of the masses, you can do a more quantitative approach, such as survey.
One can call it Bland.