安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
The whole requirement of one handed blades is that they're smaller than a katana, since that's a two-handed weapon that's too big to use with one hand.
@OP, the problem with oversized swords isn't always whether it's physically possible, it's the proportions. Real swords are thin, because they need to cut things. When you make a sword that's fairly thick and has a very broad blade, it starts to make it look cartoonish. If a sword is too long in comparison to its wielder it starts to get very unwieldy. The result of that in games is the weapon clipping through the environment, which doesn't look great. Additionally, the handle needs to grow in length in order to generate the proper power of the sword. When the handle is too small it adds to the cartoonish look.
I'd personally argue that the Galatine is already too long and only looks good because of how thin it is compared to the other large swords. Furthermore, just because there are already bigger swords, does not at all mean that we should continue adding them.