安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
0 
举报此帖
If so, would it be possible to allow us to determine in the mod settings which jobs require which tools (or no tools)? This will increase compatibility with ALL mods that add jobs, as we can configure them to work properly with/without certain tools without a patch being required on your part (saving you work and increasing compatibility). As a secondary advantage, this allows people to customise the mod to all sorts of crazy requirements - like making mining require an axe if they really, really want to.
If this is doable, would something be possible with materials as well?
Adding in these 2 features (if possible) could potentially mean that lots of compatibility patches are no longer necessary, greatly benefiting both mod users and yourself.
Run and Gun does a similar thing with it's "light" and "heavy" weapon designations - it provides a list of all the games weapons, and lets the users decide which categories they go in. This means that any mod-added weapons can be handled properly with a simple settings change.