Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Yes, I have always enjoyed this idea, and I fully agree with Gearheart, I think you all are taking this the wrong way, I was just worried this would outclass the medic, but my worries have been explained away, and now people are just straying to far from my first, and only, complaint, which has been fixed, The medic is already the best healer, but the problem is, not enough people play him, this might allow more heals when a medic play is not around, the medic and engineer are two different classes in terms of support, and this proves that
Where this will allow both healing and ammo, it lacks the healing speed of a medi-gun, plus without overheal or Ubercharge, still prevents the medics role as "Deticated healer" being stolen, so PLEASE stop taking my original worry the wrong way, and PLEASE stop bugging Gearheart about a worry that he already explaind THREE times
Uncle Danes idea makes engineer slower (a terrible idea for a weapon meant for frontline support) and just regenerates Engineer's metal and HP without any requirement. Making it a gun fixes both of these problems.