Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So I can make an actual border state that's very weak and reliant on me.
This serves 2 purposes:
(1) I can defend a choke point by proxy by building up a bastion
(2) It expands the naval cap of the vassal allowing them actually useful fleets.
Note: I'm perfectly happy if the AI is allowed to rebuild the station after my build [bc the AI never does :p ]
More Motivation Explanation...
Currently sometimes I intentionally hold off gifting a system to a vassal specifically bc I want to build a station first. Even then, once the system is gifted, once I research a higher station tech level I often find myself wishing I could upgrade various weak stations bc the AI never seems to be able to keep up/upgrade them on their own. Current workaround is using yesmen console command gifting the system to me, building it up, and returning the system, this is a pain though :/
I often find myself maintaining territory on the other side of neighboring vassals just so I can efficiently claim new stuff. Needless to say this leads to a lot of needless border gore. treating vassal territory as if I owned it for the purposes of calculating claim influence costs would go a long ways to much cleaner borders :)