Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Excal is so saturated with skins, it's becoming a joke. A joke that you should ignore. "Oh yea, just another Excal skin. Nothing to see here people, move along."
The talent here is obvious. But the character is a meme at this point and not worth investing in.
I don't think it's called criticism if your "critique" is just "nobody should want this because there are already skins for Excalibur." You aren't talking about the good and bad points of the skin, just that it shouldn't exist in your opinion, which is not at all criticism.
There is no reason to attack a content creator for making a skin for any frame they want. If you think the market for Excalibur skins is over saturated and you want skins for specific frames then make them yourself, don't shoot down peoples work just because you can't see the value in it.
I'm voting yes just coz of this