Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
I remember 'fixing' it by copying the loop that adds civs to the list of those usable for civil wars, having the first only add dead city states, then have the second loop fire only if the list is empty after the first loop and add major civs. That way dead city-states were used first, and the chance of the player getting stuck was at least decreased :P.
The dark age system just makes it so civs that get ahead get SLAPPED down and never get back up again. Just straight up an execution they lose entire cities its actually sad to watch in spectator mode. Its like if the bronze age collapse happened on repeat and only as an f you in particular to whatever civilization pushed the boundaries at any time.
If the real world worked like this england would have researched industrialization, realized they had just finished a heroic age a few turns ago so now theyre in rock bottom prestige, realized india already built taj mahal and theres no making it again, and then went "welp, guess the sun sets now" and completely imploded in the 1820s.