Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
I remember 'fixing' it by copying the loop that adds civs to the list of those usable for civil wars, having the first only add dead city states, then have the second loop fire only if the list is empty after the first loop and add major civs. That way dead city-states were used first, and the chance of the player getting stuck was at least decreased :P.
The dark age system just makes it so civs that get ahead get SLAPPED down and never get back up again. Just straight up an execution they lose entire cities its actually sad to watch in spectator mode. Its like if the bronze age collapse happened on repeat and only as an f you in particular to whatever civilization pushed the boundaries at any time.
If the real world worked like this england would have researched industrialization, realized they had just finished a heroic age a few turns ago so now theyre in rock bottom prestige, realized india already built taj mahal and theres no making it again, and then went "welp, guess the sun sets now" and completely imploded in the 1820s.