Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
right now there's a few patches of the world that have 80% dead infants, almost all because epidemics
meanwhile in Asia, almost no infants die
the only way to balance that is trough random deaths because plagues have a tendency to concentrate in specific places
40% infant mortality across the globe is the average estimated by historians if you want to go that route
then ramping up adult life expectancy, because very few get to the 50, and almost none to 60
this is realistic for peasants but unrealistic for nobles, most nobles who didn't die as infants, should die by their 50's/60's, and I'm getting way too much 30's death
children survival rates without vaccine and medicine nowadays:
measles: 90-95%
chickenpox: 95%
smallpox: 40-60%
consumption: 40-50%
those numbers could be well used I think, because these data are from places nowadays that don't have medicine and vaccine
source is chatgpt, and a few gameplays of mine