Winkelpagina
Counter-Strike 2
Alles Discussies Screenshots Beeldmateriaal Uitzendingen Video's Workshop Nieuws Gidsen Recensies

Counter-Strike 2

Winkelpagina
Counter-Strike 2 >  Workshop > Workshop van Klems > Bourg > Discussies
Bourg
Beschrijving Discussies1 Opmerkingen117 Wijzigingen
geng 17 mrt 2015 om 8:25
too t sided?
i think this map is a little bit too t sided and also there are not many places to be (very open)
i still think with a little improvement this map can be a competetive map :D
< >
1-8 van 8 reacties weergegeven
Muffin 18 mrt 2015 om 17:28 
Not at all. Its just too open.
#1
geng 19 mrt 2015 om 9:55 
Origineel geplaatst door Ppr:♥♥♥:
Not at all. Its just too open.
ye i agree too open and not many positions
Laatst bewerkt door geng; 19 mrt 2015 om 9:55
#2
Klems  [ontwikkelaar] 20 mrt 2015 om 21:10 
It's always hard to tell the sideness of a map so early, especially with so few datas. I would say it's T sided myself, but I tried to give enough tools to both teams, so really I don't know.

Not many positions, are you talking about the bombsites? The bombsites are somewhat simple so T don't have to check too many corners, but you can still easily defend bombsites from CT Spawn or Middle. Do you think middle and B is too open? I'm open to any suggestions.
#3
geng 21 mrt 2015 om 0:41 
Origineel geplaatst door Klems:
It's always hard to tell the sideness of a map so early, especially with so few datas. I would say it's T sided myself, but I tried to give enough tools to both teams, so really I don't know.

Not many positions, are you talking about the bombsites? The bombsites are somewhat simple so T don't have to check too many corners, but you can still easily defend bombsites from CT Spawn or Middle. Do you think middle and B is too open? I'm open to any suggestions.
yes i think the map is too open, and there is a window between mid and around ct spawn i think it too easy for ct's to know if the t's are mid
#4
Muffin 21 mrt 2015 om 10:25 
I honestly think you should just add more buildings ad clutter. Make the map a little more tight and squishy. Small maps benefit from this in a way.
#5
Klems  [ontwikkelaar] 24 apr 2015 om 17:00 
After playtests and demo analysis, there was 145 T rounds opposed to 105 CT rounds, which mean the map is roughly 58% T sided. This is on par with Nuke, except the other way around. This was before a few changes to the layout. If anybody is interested into the datas http://demo.ehvag.de/#551bdb206e8dfd535794d845,551bdb206e8dfd535794d844,551bdb216e8dfd535794d846,551bdb3e6e8dfd535794d849,551bdb386e8dfd535794d847,551bdb3d6e8dfd535794d848,551bdb586e8dfd535794d84a,551bdb616e8dfd535794d84c,551bdb616e8dfd535794d84b,551bdb856e8dfd535794d84d,551bdb8a6e8dfd535794d84e,551bdb8b6e8dfd535794d84f
#6
DoNGa^ 5 sep 2015 om 8:15 
I think you should change the opening at b. To left side instead. So it take longer for t to get there. I really like a site. But I think B site should be reworked.
#7
-SHIFFTY- 20 mei 2016 om 12:56 
I think, if you move back a bit the T spawn, its gives the CT's a bit more time to build up the defense.
#8
< >
1-8 van 8 reacties weergegeven
Per pagina: 1530 50