安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Now the thing is, only the cubes are solid, and will effectively "hold stuff", but the ropes are not solid (and no, cant be made solid either) so they dont "hold stuff", now think about a cloth, its a grid of solid dots connected by non solid lines, that tend to be elastic (because thats just how ropes work in Source)
Now you should be getting a picture in your head as to why the cloth will suck at holding ragdolls (and in fact most 'thin'/small objects) the ragdoll would just rest on some solid dots, but because the Cloth is partially elastic, the thing will sag under the weight of the ragdoll, wich in turn increases the distance between the solid dots, creating big gaps of not solid stuff.
So to summarize, what happens is that the ragdoll simply falls trough the cloth because as far as the physics engine is aware, the cloth isnt a single solid object, its a grid of tiny solid objects roped together, and the ragdoll fits trough the gaps with ease, even at the highest quality setting.
I will try come up with some solution to this problem for the "MeshCloth Pro" (see other thread for details on what that is) but dont pin me down on it, it very much remains to be seen if itll ever be possible to overcome this bug.