Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
https://steamhost.cn/curator/40640212/
The reason I bring this up among many others I've found recently is that curators like this have members trading away curator copies without even having reviewed the games that they were given curator copies for. At a certain point it's kind of ridiculous that this kind of stuff is being allowed to continue. Sure it's not THAT big of a deal, but this obviously isn't what the developers of the games give access through curator groups to people for. They don't intend for these people to in turn not even play or activate a curator copy on their own account but trade it away to benefit themselves without giving the game any attention. Sure a curator group isn't obligated to review a game positively or negatively if they are given a copy of the game, but not even claiming the game for themselves and giving it to someone else for their own gain is a bit much.